|
|
In
a 1963 article in The Piano Teacher titled ``On Musicianship and Style,''
Ulanowsky wrote:
``It is very difficult at times to discriminate between the legitimate,
artistically acceptable, or at least debatable, reflection of a composer's work
in the facets of the player's personality on the one side, and its erratic or
downright irresponsible disfigurement on the other, except in its most
conspicuous outgrowths. For proper judgement, we would have to rely on a very
well developed sense of values, of balance and proportion, in addition to
specific information concerning history, style, scope, and content of the music
we are listening to. All these ingredients serve in their various departments as
yardsticks for inherent limitations on individual freedom of movement and
digression....
``As we discover various discrepancies between the original score and its
performances (some highly imaginative and supra-original editions of standard
literature belong in this field of consideration), we find that some are
far-reaching extensions of the composer's intent, while others are outright
contradictions of it. Such liberties have a compelling authority when they come
from the head and hands of a master; they may be based on a logic which deviates
from that of the Urtext [original score], but as they are organically
developed from the same point of departure, they are artistically defensible to
a degree, even though they seldom represent a demonstrable improvement.
``The real damage, of course, happens when a neophyte sees fit to adopt such a
variant, or worse, only part of it, without possessing the same personality,
authority, and penetration of the subject that is manifest in his model. Upon
inquiry as to the raison d'etre of these cuckoo's eggs in the
performance, we will be told, `That's how X played it on this record or in this
recital.' ''
|
|
|
In
the same article cited above, after a humorous section on ultra-slow tempi, he
wrote:
"We must also be on guard against the glorification of speed, especially where
it merely serves to show Technique Triumphant. It is a hard and sad fact that
excessive speed triumphs not only over problems of execution but also over music
itself. Speed is a poor substitute for spirit or any nicety of detail which
needs a certain minimum of time to manifest itself. Responsibility for this very
conspicuous trend in our concert halls must be borne by those virtuosi who set
the pace with their dazzling tempi and exert an insidious pressure of
professional and, let us admit it, commercial character on their colleagues to
enter the race. This phenomenon is not limited to virtuoso literature where its
existence is arguable but has wormed its way into the precincts of chamber music
where it wreaks its proportionate havoc, more's the pity."
|
|
|
From
a 1962 interview with Studs Terkel:
``I think the most important thing, is the honesty with which you try
to identify yourself with the composer, or, when it comes to the vocal
literature, with the composer and poet. To go back to what they wanted to put
down in their combined work of sound and word, to go to the ends of your
imagination in recreating the atmosphere out of which they have written this
particular song, and then transmit it in terms of your own perception, as well
as in terms of your own artistry and vocal or instrumental gifts, still, however, trying to be their spokesman, rather than consider
whatever you do as a playground for your personal endowment. If you do that, and
if you keep that foremost in your work, I think the rest will take care of
itself. It's just a matter
of schooling and education.''
To listen to the
interview,
click
here.
|
|
|
In
Lotte Lehmann's farewell speech to her New York Town Hall audience, after
thanking various managers and friends, she spoke of her friend and accompanist
thus:
``Paul Ulanowsky has been the ideal accompanist for me. We understood each other
musically in perfect time; and always, when I sang with him, it was as if the
hands of an angel have supported me. [Turning to him:] Now don't you get
conceited! I only mean you were an angel when you played; otherwise you were not
so angelic. He has a very keen sense of humor, and you can believe me, that is a
great asset on concert tours, where many incidents happen where one gets
hysterical and upset, but he smoothed out everything, and he always made me
laugh, and he turned every tragedy into a joke. So, really, he's quite a
wonderful guy! I hope that my successors, who will sing with him in the future,
will be as happy with him as I have been, musically and personally. Thank you,
Paulchen.'' (Click
to return to Biography page)o Biography)
|
|
|
|
|
|
More
quotes
to come.
|
|
|
|
|
|